Sabrimala Issue

The Sabarimala issue revolves around the controversy surrounding the entry of women of menstruating age into the Sabarimala temple in Kerala, India. The temple, dedicated to Lord Ayyappa, has traditionally barred women between the ages of 10 and 50 from entering the premises.

Historical Background

The restriction on women's entry was based on the belief that Lord Ayyappa was a celibate deity, and the presence of women of menstruating age would disrupt the temple's spiritual atmosphere. This tradition was challenged in court, leading to a landmark judgment in 2018.

Supreme Court Judgment (2018)

The Supreme Court of India ruled that the prohibition on women's entry into the Sabarimala temple was unconstitutional, citing the principles of equality and non-discrimination [4]. The court stated that the restriction was not essential to the practice of the Hindu religion and that women should be allowed to enter the temple.

Protests and Controversy

The judgment sparked widespread protests and controversy in Kerala, with many devotees and Hindu organizations opposing the court's decision. The protests turned violent, with clashes between police and protesters, resulting in injuries and arrests.

Latest Updates

In 2020, the Supreme Court referred the Sabarimala case to a larger bench, citing the need for a more nuanced examination of the issue. The larger bench is yet to deliver its verdict.

In the meantime, the Kerala government has implemented measures to ensure the safe entry of women into the temple, including providing security and facilities for women devotees.

The Sabarimala issue remains a contentious topic in India, with ongoing debates about gender equality, religious freedom, and the role of the judiciary in shaping social norms.

References:

[4] Supreme Court of India judgment in Indian Young Lawyers Association vs. The State of Kerala (2018)

[5] Supreme Court of India order referring the Sabarimala case to a larger bench (2020)